.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~
THE
SEARCH LIGHT
Guiding your web site to the
top of the search engines...
~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~
27
May 2002
Vol. 2 Issue # 6
Editor
: Kalena Jordan, CEO, Web Rank Ltd
------------------------------------------------------------
Welcome
to the "THE SEARCH LIGHT".
You
are receiving this monthly newsletter because you
are one of our clients,
you've subscribed, requested
a free ranking report or
quotation via our site, sent us
an FAQ or someone has
forwarded it to you.
UNSUBSCRIBE instructions
are at the end of this
newsletter. (Replying to
this email WILL NOT unsubscribe you).
If
you like this newsletter, please forward a copy of it to any
friend or colleague who is responsible for a web site and
would like to improve their
ranking in the search engines.
------------------------------------------------------------
IN THIS ISSUE
------------------------------------------------------------
=> Editor’s
Message
=>
Sponsorship Notice
=>
Feature Article – WebPosition™ Releases v2.0 Beta &
Rejects
Reporting Issues (Interview with Brent Winters,
President of FirstPlace Software™)
=>
Industry News – Google, AOL & Dilbert Share the
Sheets
– Search Engine Strategies Sydney Update
– Overture Announces 3 Year Deal with Yahoo!
– Open Directory Forum Gets Two Thumbs Up
– LookSmart Asks For Feedback – Too Late
– The Feedback
LookSmart DIDN’T Ask For
– Google’s
New Editorial Policies
Baffle Advertisers
–
Maximizing Your Profits on Google
AdWords Select
– Countdown to Launch of SEO Consultants Directory
=> Search Engine
FAQ's – The Ole “Hyphenated Keywords In the Domain” Trick
=>
Site Spotlight – Win a FREE Pass to Search Engine
Strategies Sydney!
=> Subscribe
/ Unsubscribe information
------------------------------------------------------------
EDITOR’S MESSAGE
------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Readers,
We’ve
got a bumper issue this month! Lots of search engine
news, events, gossip and even a competition. What’s more,
we’ve finally included our interview with Brent Winters that
was held over last month thanks to the LookSmart fiasco.
As
you all know, Search Engine Strategies comes to Sydney
next month. The bad news is, I’ve only got around two weeks to
prepare my multiple presentations for the Conference - Aarghh L.
The good news is I’ve been fortunate enough to score a free pass
to give away to one of you lucky readers! See our Site Spotlight
section at the end of this newsletter for how to be in the draw. The
winner will be notified by email & announced in next month’s
issue.
The
other good news is that I’ll finally be taking a long overdue
vacation after the Sydney Conference, from June 13 to 23. My
husband and I plan to spend a few days tracking down the best
coffee in Melbourne, followed by a trip to Tasmania to track down
a mountain or two (hopefully those with a hot spa at the bottom!).
Next
month we’ll bring you a review of WebPosition Gold’s™ full
version 2.0 software, which is due for release in the next few weeks.
We also expect to have loads of industry news and gossip to share
with you from Search Engine Strategies.
Due
to my vacation, our June newsletter will probably be out a couple
of days later than normal. Meanwhile, enjoy this issue and spare a
thought for me hiking through the wilderness of Tasmania’s National
Parks in the middle of Winter.
Till
next month,
Kalena
J
------------------------------------------------------------
SPONSORSHIP NOTICE
------------------------------------------------------------
Trying
to manage a Pay Per Click campaign at
Overture? Don’t have time to check and update
your bids regularly? Ever find you’re over bidding?
In an independent review by Web Rank, BidRank
performed as the best bid management software
for managing Overture campaigns. BidRank uses
its automated bidding ability to control your bids,
aiming for your target rank but always within your
set bid maximum. With its revolutionary “Gap Surfing”
technology, BidRank closes costly bid gaps,
ensuring your bid is always the most cost effective.
Click
Here to get your BidRank FREE TRIAL:
http://store.yahoo.com/cgi-bin/clink?bidright+NARxJp+index.html
Mention
Coupon Code WR 007 to obtain a 5% discount!
------------------------------------------------------------
FEATURE ARTICLE
WebPosition
Releases v2.0 & Rejects Reporting Issues
(Interview with Brent Winters, President of FirstPlace Software™)
by Kalena Jordan
------------------------------------------------------------
As
you would have heard, FirstPlace Software™, creators of the
hugely popular WebPosition Gold ™ search engine marketing
software, recently announced the forthcoming release of the long-awaited
version 2 of their product. WPG v2.0 is already available in Beta format
(see link below) and boasts an impressive number of new features to help
web masters ensure their web sites are spider friendly, ranking highly
and submitted to the most appropriate search engines and directories
worldwide.
I
recently took the opportunity to interview President of FirstPlace
Software™
Brent Winters about their new product and also about his
views
on the increasing crackdown on automatic reporting tools by some of the
major search engines.
Below
is a transcript of the interview:
(WR)
= Web Rank, (BW) = Brent Winters
Question
1 (WR)
- Why has it taken so long for FirstPlace Software to release a new
(BETA) version of WebPosition Gold™?
(BW)
A couple of factors contributed to the delay.
We under-estimated the
amount of work to keep the current version up to date with the
continuous changes at the search engines, while still contributing
resources to version 2. We
ended up
spending time adding and removing engines in the existing product, adding new
features,
etc. so we were not standing still since version 1.0.
In fact, we are on version 1.60.5 now.
We
eventually added new developers to accelerate work on version 2.
In
addition,
version 2 includes a tremendous number of new features and engines.
In retrospect, we should have scaled back the number of features for version 2
and saved more for version 3. Fortunately,
our customers will benefit from
getting
a lot of bang for their buck when they upgrade.
Question
2 (WR) - In your opinion, what is the most important or significant
feature of the new version?
(BW)
There are so many important features it is difficult to boil it down to
a
single
most important feature. Every customer will have their favorite
depending
on how they tend to use the product.
Certainly the support for new
country
specific engines is a big one. Unlike
other products, this support
extends
beyond just submission and reporting.
The Page Critic also provides
valuable
advice for how to improve your rankings in over 75 major engines.
A
current
(although not exhaustive) list of new features can be found at:
http://www.webposition.com/wpg2upgrade.htm
Question
3 (WR) - The BETA version of WPG v2 includes regional search
engines – something your customers have been asking about for years.
Why
did it take so long to include these?
(BW)
See above
Question
4 (WR) - Only a handful of countries were included in the regional
engines. Do you plan to include other country search engines (e.g. New
Zealand and more Asian countries) in future releases?
(BW)
Please keep in mind that you are looking at a beta version right now.
We are
working hard to add new engines to fill any significant gaps and are listening
to customer feedback. For
example, you mentioned Asian countries. We
already
have support for some Japanese and Chinese engines and are working on adding
more. We support a dozen
different regions currently: Global/US, Canada,
United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, France, Spain/Latin America, Russia,
Italy,
Japan,
China, Scandinavia and the Netherlands.
Some
countries like the UK have support for eight or more engines already (or
will
very shortly). Others have
only a few. How many they
have depends on how
many popular engines we are able to locate for that region, and how far along
we are in the development of that region.
Even after we release the product we
will continue to add more engines (or remove engines) as things change and we
receive feedback from customers. We
may add support for entirely new regions
depending
upon demand.
Question
5 (WR) - The major search engines, most noticeably Google, have
recently been taking a stand against the use of rank reporting software
and
even banning the IP addresses of persons using it. How has this impacted
WPG sales and how will it affect future releases? Can you confidently
say it is safe for customers to use WPG right now to check their ranks?
(BW)
A very small percentage of customers had their IP blocked by Google in
early
2001. I've heard of no one having
their IP blocked for using WebPosition on
any
search engines for over six months since we released updates to more
precisely
emulate a browser. Version
2 includes an additional safety feature
to
slow down searches to a user-definable amount.
That way you can be more
courteous
to the search engines while maintaining a lower profile.
We continue
to encourage customers to keep their queries to a minimum with the search
engines (For example, there's
generally no reason to run reports every single
day
or for hundreds of keywords). You
should also run reports at night
whenever
possible.
As
far as our sales, they remain strong and demand for the product remains
strong.
Businesses with an on-line presence have a significant need to
track
and
improve their search rankings. That
is not a need that is likely to change
anytime
soon. Only the methodology
and techniques to improve visibility on the
engines
have changed over the years and will continue to change.
We'll
continue
to update the product to accommodate that.
Question
6 (WR) - Is there any scope for arrangements with search engines
that allow your software limited access to their servers in a restricted
reporting
capacity, similar to Overture's recent 3rd Party provider agreement with
Bid
Management
Software companies?
(BW)
We already have formal affiliate agreements with many major engines
including Overture, FindWhat, Looksmart, Bay9, Ah-Ha, About.com, and
others. It is our goal to
work with the search engines whenever possible and reach mutually
beneficial agreements. We
approached Google last year, sending over half a dozen letters and faxes
to various VP's in their organization.
We
offered practical proposals to create a more mutually beneficial
relationship.
Eventually we gave up on the matter when their VP continued to fail to
get back
with us as promised. It does not
appear to be a high priority issue at Google
right
now from what I can tell.
Question
7 (WR) - Do you have any exciting new features you plan to add to
future WPG releases?
(BW)
We always have many features we'd like to add.
However, we're focusing
our efforts right now on finishing the long-anticipated version 2 and
making sure
all the features included in it work really well.
We may not bang out a major
new
upgrade every six months because we focus a great deal of effort to
refining
the product to work as advertised.
Many companies focus on including
every bell and whistle under the sun, whether it has value or not, and then
invest little time to fixing bugs reported by customers.
This can be maddening
as a consumer and a huge time-waster if you buy a whiz-bang great product and
then
do nothing but waste time trying to battle crashes, lock ups, etc.
In
our case, we are so serious about producing a quality product that we
offer
up
to $50 bug bounties to customers for being the first to find and report
a
problem.
(These are credits good for the purchase of an upgrade, knowledge
base subscription, or other product).
It should also be kept in mind that we
update the product weekly if not more often so our technology is never
standing still between major upgrades.
We also prefer to give customers new features and updates for
free rather than trying to stick them with a new paid upgrade every six
to eight months.
With
version 2, we'll be continuing our policy of free product support.
Much
of
our competition offers no phone support, or charges $50 or more per
call.
We're
also striving to maintain average e-mail response times at 24 hours or
less.
This has always been a priority issue for me since I've personally been
on
the receiving end of bad customer support many times.
I promised myself to
run
things differently when I founded this company ten years ago.
Web
Rank would like to thank Brent Winters for taking the time to respond to
our questions. If you have additional questions about WebPosition
Gold™ as a result of reading this interview, please visit the
links below, or email WebPosition support staff via help@webposition.com.
If you’d like to trial the Beta version of WPG v2.0 please download it
from the link below.
Assuming
it is released in time, next month I will feature a review of the full
release WebPosition Gold™ v2.0. So stay tuned!
More:
http://www.webposition.com/d2.pl?r=GCU-55EC
(home page)
http://www.webposition.com/wpg2upgrade.htm
(outline of new features in v2.0)
-----------------------------------------------------------
The
above article may be re-published as long as the following paragraph
and URL link are included at the end of the article:
Kalena
Jordan, CEO of Web Rank Ltd, was among the first search engine
optimization experts in Australia and New Zealand and is well known and
respected in her field. For more of her tips on search engine ranking
and
online marketing, please visit:
http://www.high-search-engine-ranking.com
------------------------------------------------------------
SEARCH ENGINE INDUSTRY NEWS
------------------------------------------------------------
Google,
AOL & Dilbert Share the Sheets
On
May 1st, Google announced they had secured a deal to provide
their
search technology to AOL properties including Netscape, Compuserve
and AOL Search. The deal also sees AOL portals utilizing Google’s paid
listings product, AdWords Select.
Google
AdWords listings now replace Overture paid listings on those portals,
cementing Google’s status as a major competitor for Overture in the
PPC
arena. It is expected Google’s search technology would be integrated
within
the sites over the next few weeks.
In the case of Netscape Search, this has already happened, with Google
results now being served up in the search listings. AOL Search is set to
follow
next, by replacing their current combination of Inktomi and Open
Directory
listings with Google search results.
Google
also took time out this month to partner with Scott Adams, cartoonist
and creator of the popular Dilbert™ office worker character. Dilbert
and his
boss will appear on Google’s home page each day this week as they
attempt
to design Google’s new logo. The final logo will be revealed on
Friday.
“Dilbert has had a large influence on Google's management style,"
said Sergey
Brin, co-founder and president of Technology, Google Inc. "I am
planning to
adopt a pointy hairdo."
More:
http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/aol.html
http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/dilbert.html
Search Engine Strategies
Sydney Update
Well the Search Engine Strategies Sydney Conference is only a
couple
of weeks away, taking place at Cockle Bay Wharf, Darling Harbour on
June 11 & 12. Keynote speakers include founder of Search Engine
Watch,
Danny Sullivan, as well as search engine optimisation specialists,
search
technology experts and representative from all the major international
and regional search engines.
The
conference will have a special focus on the Australian and New
Zealand search market and issues particularly relevant to our region.
I’ll be speaking at a couple of sessions, including Designing
Search
Engine Friendly Sites, Successful Site Architecture. I’m also on
the
panel for Site Clinic so if you do attend, make sure you say
hello!
Whether
you are completely new to search engine promotion or an
experienced marketer wanting the latest search engine industry news,
you’ll find this conference extremely valuable. If you want some
advice
on the search engine compatibility of your site, don’t miss the Site
Clinic
session where we’ll be critiquing the sites of audience members live
on
stage. Apparently tickets are selling fast so make sure you book early!
A
full agenda for the Conference is now online at the URL below and if
you book now you can take advantage of early bird savings. If you plan
to attend and haven’t yet booked, you can go into our draw to win a
FREE pass. The winner will be announced this Friday 31st May
and
notified via email. Details on how to enter are in our “Site
Spotlight”
section at the end of this newsletter.
More:
http://australia.internet.com/events/ses02/
http://www.ihelpyouservices.com/forums/t2405/s.html
http://searchenginestrategies.com/
Overture
Announces 3 Year Deal with Yahoo!
This
month, Overture announced they had signed a deal with Yahoo! Inc.
to extend their relationship for a further three years. The deal sees
Overture
continue to provide paid search listings on Yahoo.com via Yahoo! Sponsor
Matches, strengthening their position as the search industry’s No. 1
Pay
Per Click provider.
More:
http://docs.yahoo.com/docs/pr/release975.html
http://www.overture.com/d/USm/about/news/index.jhtml
Open
Directory Forum Gets Two Thumbs Up
For
some months, I had been experiencing a problem trying to get a
client site listed in Open Directory (http://dmoz.org),
so I decided to try
out the new ODP Public Forum. Because this particular client had been
burned by a rogue SEO using unethical submission methods in the past,
some of their search engine listings had been jeopardized in the
process.
I suspected the site’s damaged “reputation” was causing the
problem at ODP.
The
ODP Editors in the forum confirmed my suspicions and were helpful
enough to point out a number of duplicate sites in the Directory that my
client was unaware still existed. They even arranged removal of the dup
sites and forwarded my submission to the correct category. It was added
3 days later!
If you are having problems getting your site listed in ODP or choosing
the
right category, I strongly suggest visiting the forums. The forum
members
are friendly, knowledgeable and are very open to discuss problems or
delays regarding getting your site listed. Just keep in mind that ODP is
run by volunteers in their free time, therefore be courteous and
patient;
your listing may take some months to be reviewed and added.
More: http://www.resource-zone.com/
LookSmart
Asks For Feedback – Too Late
In
my experience, if you ask senior executives at LookSmart if they are
receiving a lot of customer complaints about their new PPC model,
they’re
likely to answer in the negative. Seems strange then that this week I
receive
an email from the ”LookSmart Small Business Team” stating that:
“…we’ve
received
a wide range of feedback from customers. We’ve
learned
that many search marketing firms are facing difficulties managing the
transition
of multiple clients from the old Site Submit product to our new Small
Business
Listings product”.
I
don’t know about you, but that reads “customer complaints” to me.
The email
went on to outline the most common issues “search professionals”
have with
the new model and ended with a survey asking for my feedback on the
product
and suggestions for how to make Small Business Listings an “indispensable
tool for you and your business”.
But
what really got to me was the following statement:
“Because
you are a customer and a search professional, we consider your
feedback
to be an invaluable part of our development process.
Hmmm.
So let me get this straight LookSmart – NOW that you’ve lost my
business and my trust, I’m suddenly important to you as a customer?
NOW
that
you switched the product I bought without consultation with me at all
and NOW that you want me to pay extra for a new product that (in my
opinion)
offers no value to me or my clients - NOW you want my feedback?
If
customers like us were such “an invaluable part of your development
process” as you claim, why on earth didn’t you request
feedback DURING
the
development process and not after the fact?
My
response to LookSmart’s survey? Thanks but no thanks.
The
Feedback LookSmart DIDN’T Ask For
Meanwhile,
the voices speaking out against LookSmart are getting
louder. What with an FBI investigation and a Class Action suit filed
(see link below), LookSmart must be feeling the pressure right now.
Adding fuel to the fire are two new articles that have appeared about
LookSmart in the past couple of weeks.
The
first one is from MarketPosition’s™ Brent Winters,
criticizing
LookSmart’s new PPC model from a customer perspective. The
other article is by a journalist at Wired™, cataloguing the
backlash
LookSmart is currently suffering. You can read those articles here:
More
: http://www.webposition.com/mp-0502.htm
http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,52741,00.html
http://www.ihelpyouservices.com/forums/t3261/s.html
(class action)
Like their new product or not, it seems people are still having a hard
time understanding how it works. Some customers are especially angry
at the way they have no control over their existing listings, even when
they’ve ”activated” their accounts. Let’s hope LookSmart sorts
this out.
I’m
still receiving feedback on the issue from LookSmart customers.
Below are a couple more examples I’ve received following my feature
article “LOOKs Can Be Deceiving” and my interview with Damian
Smith of LookSmart Australia that appeared in our Search Light
Special Edition newsletter last week:
Hi
Kalena
I
just read your latest article on the Looksmart changes.
Looksmart's
rep came out with this crass statement in the interview you
published:
We're
giving our legacy customers US$300 in value-that's more than
they ever paid in the first place.
Is
it just me or does anyone else see the flaw in this argument? Are we
supposed to be grateful for this? It may be more than we paid but it is
not
the value we paid for. The fact that they have
arbitrarily fixed a per-click
price and then given us $300 worth does not wash. My original payment
was supposed to guarantee a listing ad infinitum. Soon after the switch
over I got a mail from Looksmart saying the clicks had been used up and
generously advised me to stuff more money in their pockets, such that:
LookSmart
recommends raising your monthly budget to $375 in
order to get the maximum value from your listing(s) in the future.
If
I was silly enough to actually give them more money (which I am not)
then I could, by their calculations, end up paying $13,500 over
three years
instead of the product that I originally bought which cost me $199 for
as
many clicks as I could get over as many years as the site is published.
[Name
withheld upon request]
-------------------------
Looksmart
U.S. have acted in a plainly unethical manner, by promoting
and
selling its product to customers on a one-time only basis with no
recurring
fees, then reneging on the original understanding…
What
makes this even worse from our company's viewpoint, is that
Looksmart
U.S. sold us 2 additional categories for US$268 in a direct
mailing
campaign. Despite the
campaign being only 6 weeks before the
introduction
of click fees, there was no mention of the impending
change.
This can only be described as a deceptive last-ditch money
grab,
to extract every last cent from customers before changing the
rules on them.
To
add fuel to the fire, Looksmart U.S. unilaterally removed our
listings when we refused to activate our account under their new terms.
The
whole experience demonstrates the arrogance of Looksmart U.S.,
their unethical business practices, and their willingness to alienate
their
own
customer base.
David
Cain.
Director,
Asia Chat
www.asiachat.com.au
-------------------------
Google’s
New Editorial Policies
Baffle Advertisers
In
direct response to their new deal to display AdWords listings on AOL
properties, Google has introduced some new editorial rules for AdWords
Select customers, apparently to satisfy AOL’s relevancy standards.
The
new rules require advertisers to avoiding excessive or unnecessary
capitalization, punctuation, and superlatives such as “best”,
“cheapest”, etc.
While
not as strict as Overture’s editorial policies, the new rules are
still
annoying and confusing customers who cannot understand Google’s
apparent obsession with caps vs no caps. For example, apparently if you
list your site URL as www.MySite.com,
your ad will be rejected until you
change the URL to www.mysite.com.
You
also can’t insert call-to-action phrases such as “Click Here” or
“Look
Here”, making it even more difficult to entice visitors to click on
your ad.
More
: https://adwords.google.com/select/guidelines.html
Maximizing
Your Profits on Google AdWords Select
If you
are having trouble coping with Google’s new editorial policies, or
if you just can’t seem to reach that desired click-thru rate on your
AdWords
ads, a new report is available to help you.
Titled
21
Techniques to Maximize your Profits on Google AdWords Select,
the report was developed by Andrew Goodman of Page Zero Media, a well
known search industry expert. The report helps you make
the most of your
AdWords account by showing you how to set up and track a campaign,
step-by-step and ensure you see a return on your investment.
I have
been meaning to review this report for some weeks and now that I
have I really wish I’d read it sooner! Then I could’ve made the most
out of
my AdWords campaigns all this time, instead of leaving them to chance.
What I
like best about this report are the practical examples Andrew uses
throughout – they make his methodologies crystal clear and very easy
to
replicate. Some of the methods Andrew demonstrates in the report
include:
-
how
to bid on popular keywords no-one else has thought of
-
how
to measure your ad effectiveness by regular tweaking
-
how
to utilize clever (allowable) tactics to entice more click-thrus
-
how
to track your ROI so you never exceed your budget and
always make a profit
With
Google fast becoming the most popular search engine, together
with their deal to display AdWords paid listings on AOL, you simply
cannot afford to ignore the power of AdWords paid listings anymore.
But to
implement an AdWords campaign AFTER absorbing the advice
provided in this report is like backing a thoroughbred in a race full of
mules: you simply can’t lose! Well done Andrew – an excellent
resource.
As per
usual, when I find a product I am impressed with and one that
offers my clients true value for money, I sign up to become an
affiliate.
The first link below is an affiliate link, but if you prefer I didn’t
receive
a commission, you can use the regular link below it.
More
: http://hop.clickbank.net/?webrank/pagezero
http://www.page-zero.com/products.asp
Countdown
to Launch of SEO Consultants Directory
In an
earlier edition of The Search Light, I mentioned a new SEO
Consultants Directory was being developed by Edward
Lewis aka
pageoneresults™.
I’m
pleased to advise that the Directory is close to completion and
ready for official launch on June 1st.
The
SEO Consultants Directory at www.seoconsultants.com
will be
a comprehensive list of Search Engine Optimization firms worldwide,
with a detailed overview of the services they provide. The idea is to
provide a starting point for persons seeking professional assistance
with their search engine marketing campaigns.
Edward
is quick to point out that the Directory will focus on quality
and not quantity:
“Utilizing
a simple search interface from the home page, users can
pre-select and/or enter a variety of search criteria and focus their
directory search results. Since all submissions are reviewed prior to
inclusion in the directory, the user is presented with a targeted list
of qualified SEO/SEM consultants and companies”.
More
: http://www.seoconsultants.com/press-release.htm
http://www.ihelpyouservices.com/forums/t1731/s.html
*-----------------HOT TIP------------------*
Like to make it easy for visitors
to find what they’re looking for
on your site? Why not add your
own search engine?
Fluid Dynamics offers a great
easy-to-install
search engine.
Freeware and shareware
versions available, with Perl
source code included.
http://www.xav.com/
*-----------------HOT
TIP------------------*
------------------------------------------------------------
SEARCH ENGINE FAQ'S :
The Ole “Hyphenated
Keywords In the Domain” Trick
-----------------------------------------------------------
Web
Rank answers your search engine questions.
Please submit your FAQ's
Although
this topic has been covered before, I still seem
to get asked this question a lot, so it bears repeating:
From: Mark Radtke (MDRadtke@mn.rr.com)
Hi
Kalena, I do have a question:
Hypothetically,
would search-engine-guide.com rank
higher than searchengineguide.com if everything else
was the same? Or is marketing-tools.com better than
marketingtools.com etc?
Not
whether people will remember to type hyphens or
which is graphically smoother or anything like that. Just
will there be a difference in search engine ranking? Do
the search engines recognize words without spaces
such as those examples?
Thanks
Mark
~~~~~~~~~~
Kalena's Response ~~~~~~~~~~
Hi
Mark
Up
until a year ago, I would've said YES, having keywords in
your domain that are separated by hyphens would give you
an edge over those sites without hyphens, all else being the same.
That's
because until recently, most search engines did not have
the ability to distinguish keywords in domain names unless they
were separated by a hyphen. But I've heard that some search
engines now have the ability to distinguish individual words in
their algorithm.
Also,
the significance of keywords in domain names has become
less important over the past year or so, in favor of body text,
link popularity and other relevancy issues. So these days, while it
might give you a very slight ranking advantage to have a hyphenated
domain, it is not as important as it used to be in the grand scheme
of things.
Hope
this helps!
Kalena
Please submit your FAQ
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
------------------------------------------------------------
SITE SPOTLIGHT: Win a FREE Pass to Search Engine Strategies
Sydney!
------------------------------------------------------------
Heading
to Sydney for the Search Engine Strategies Conference
from June 11-12? Like to score a FREE pass to the two-day
event? We’re giving one lucky reader the opportunity to do just
that. All you have to do is email us with the answer to the following
easy question:
What
is the name of the keyword research software that is considered
”Best of Breed” in the industry? Hint: the answer can be found on
the
following page of our web site:
http://www.high-search-engine-ranking.com/free_stuff.htm
All
correct answers will go into a draw for the free pass. To be in the
draw, just send an email to us
with the subject line “SES Pass Giveaway” and your answer in
the body of the email.
Entries
close midnight EST Thursday 30th May (GMT + 10) and I’ll
be drawing the winner on Friday morning at 10am EST. The lucky
recipient will be notified by email the same day. Good Luck!
------------------------------------------------------------
LAST MONTH:
------------------------------------------------------------
Last
month we discussed several important topics including:
–
LOOKs Can Be Deceiving
– Google Becomes Most Used Search Engine
– Looksmart’s New PPC Model
– Google Slapped With Overture Lawsuit
– Looksmart AU Does Deal With Yahoo AU
– Court Orders Site to Drop Competitor References
– Yahoo Resets User Accounts to Receive Spam
– Should You Use a Company Name in the Title Tag?
If
you missed these or other key topics, you can find back
issues of The Search Light at:
http://www.high-search-engine-ranking.com/free_newsletter.htm
------------------------------------------------------------
COPYRIGHT INFORMATION
------------------------------------------------------------
No
part of this newsletter may be copied without permission from
Web Rank, the copyright owners 2002.
You may forward this
newsletter, as long as it's kept in its entirety.
------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
------------------------------------------------------------
The
information presented in The Search Light has been compiled from
various sources for the benefit of our clients. You should not rely on
the information contained within this newsletter as detailed advice.
The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of Web
Rank. In
providing this information, we make every effort to ensure it is
correct and up to date. However, because of the widespread nature of
our information sources, no guarantee is given for the accuracy of
content throughout this publication. Web Rank disclaim all
liability in
the event of inaccuracies found.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Web
Rank Ltd, Search Engine Ranking Specialists
Visit our web sites : www.high-search-engine-ranking.com,
www.webrank.biz